Corruption in the Philippines
Home
Chronological
Problematical
Search

[Editor's Note: I don't have a copy of brother Steve Wallace's note to Wallace Little. If you would like to read brother Hayuhay's prior note, click here.]

You wrote to Wally:
I think this passage may well be said, "O full of all deceit and all fraud, you son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease perverting the straight ways of the Lord?"

Bot here:
Wow, is this a "word" of a true Christian? Have you learned it from Christ?

You wrote to Wally:
I ask simple questions to you and Bot. These were elementary questions! Some could have been answered with a simple "yes" or "no" but you would not answer.

Bot here:
I answered your questions but not the way you wanted it.

Below in red is my answer (dated April 5) to your last letter to me (dated April 4):
[Editor's Note: The dates given above do not match the file dates that I have.]

Bot here:
You quoted 1John 4:1 and that is good. Then you need to prove your teachings whether they are of God.

On Galatians 1:6-9, I think you have the task to prove that Paul was talking about MDR and you need to prove it by context.

Here is what you wrote: (dated March 26,2004 8:56 AM)
If you have been married before, and your first wife "lives" and you did not "put her away" for "fornication" (Matt. 19:9), then you are called an "Adulterer." You can pervert the gospel all you want to accommodate your second marriage or view but when it is all said and done, you simply preach "another" gospel (Gal. 1:6-9)

Bot here again:
Now who is dodging? Please do your task. Prove that MDR is what the context says.

Remember I cited 1 Cor. 15: 1-4 that says; Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain.For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

Now do you want me to prove it by context that what was Paul talking about was the DBR? This is an easy task unlike yours it is difficult for you to prove that MDR was the context of Gal. 1:6-9. I think you are putting words in Paul's mouth.

Okay, I am waiting for your answer.


Bot Hayuhay
You wrote to wally:
I asked 10 questions that were written out of a series of posts which started with Bot hurling some charge at me about warning brethren of him. He wanted to know "why?"

Bot here:
Steve Wallace from Germany admitted already that he was the one. I am sorry that I have mistaken you because you have the same names.

You wrote:
Well, before I didn't know him, now I will certainly warn brethren of him. I told him if Steve Wallace (in Germany, usually go by Steven J. Wallace) warned anyone about him that it was probably based on some teaching, e.i. "One Covenant" and or "MDR."

Bot here:
Okay do what ever you wanted to do. Go ahead! Anyway, it has been done longtime ago by someone else.

You wrote to Wally:
I then asked Bot what he believed regarding those two doctrines. He spins like a top and wants to change the subject to a study of the Death, Burial and Resurrection, yet refusing to answer a question as to when the NEW COVENANT came into effect.

Bot here:
You lied again. I answered you, which was dated March 25. Here it is: (I will put it in red)

You wrote:
Yes I believe in the covenant of Jesus and yes it is eternal in the sense of God knowing it from the foundation of the world (cf. Eph. 3:11; 2 Tim. 1:9).

Bot here:
I am glad that we are one in this view. I am glad that you believe the ETERNAL COVENANT of Jesus. I am glad that you know that God foreknew it before the foundation of the world.

You asked:
When did the NEW COVENANT come in force? Was it at creation, at Sinai, at the cross? Please answer this question!

Your answer to your own question:
But it was not made with ANYONE until Jesus came and died on the tree? Jeremiah looked forward to it in 31:31ff. Do you believe a covenant is in force only after one dies or before(Heb. 9:16, 17)?

Bot here:
I observed that I have no problem with it since you already answered your own question. And I would like to tell you that I agree with you.

Then If you will write again to everybody to distance from me and not to hear my teachings then you are actually hindering them to your own teachings.

You wrote:
Now, to the direct point of controversy, do you believe that if a man divorces his wife for any other reason than fornication (a sexual violation of the marriage bed) and marries another that he is in a state of adultery and remains so until he puts and end to that union? Don't dodge the issue because I do not have the time or patience for anyone who wants to.

Bot here:
What you consider CONTROVERSY in America is not applicable here in the Philippines. It has no bearing here since we have no divorce according to our FAMILY CODE.

You wrote to Wally:
Bot wants to know how I can place MDR in Galatians 1 where it speaks of a different gospel.

Bot here:
Because you used Gal. 1:6-9 in your arguement.
Here is what you wrote: (dated March 26,2004 8:56 AM)
If you have been married before, and your first wife "lives" and you did not "put her away" for "fornication" (Matt. 19:9), then you are called an "Adulterer." You can pervert the gospel all you want to accommodate your second marriage or view but when it is all said and done, you simply preach "another" gospel (Gal. 1:6-9)
Bot here again:
I hope we would be able to discuss the issue decently. You easily loose your temper and that is not a sign of a good debater. From our few exchanges you are expossing yourself. I don't need to tell everybody who you are since you already sent it to many and you know what?... "You betrayed yourself."

I am looking forward to be your brother in Christ in the near future. I hope you see the light soon.

your brother... to be,

Bot Hayuhay

[Editor's Note: Click here for the next note in this series.]